We (LASD) have the potential to have one of the most innovative and progressive school districts in the country, yet we are constantly under siege by a minority looking to fight a political battle about public education. Let's focus on the kids.
Friday, February 21, 2014
To self-site, or not to self-site?
Apologies to Mr Shakespeare, but apparently that is the question. Why do some charters choose to provide their own facilities, while others piggyback on the local district to furnish them? Seems to me that finances would play a role here, because low income areas would be dependent upon help from the government. But what about the richest 1%? Seems that they could self-site and build an awesome facility of opulence and prestige. So, when they don't do that, something else must be a driving motivation. Could it be revenge, for the errant closing (and subsequent realization and reopening) of the only LASD school in the hills? Could it be spite, because of perceived injustices brought upon by the LASD board? Could it be a political maneuver to help set legal precedent for all of the less privileged "I want school choice because it is my god-given right" proponents? Maybe it's just a game for some rich folks with too much money and time on their hands? Who knows, but hopefully we'll find out someday, before too many more kids get "used" in the process...
Wednesday, February 12, 2014
Marketing, or honesty, which will win the day?
I do feel bad for the parents who had to skip latte hour in order to picket at the LASD offices yesterday, but I have to wonder if they know about what they are picketing. Common sense would say that kids were being deprived of something, but that's not the case because NO kids (LASD or BCS) have access to the rooms right now. So. perhaps the picketing was because the BCS teachers don't have access to the rooms at Blach? If that's the case, then we should move the whole congregation to Mr Moore's house, because it is actually BCS who has refused to sign the agreement which would provide them access. And why did they refuse? Because the rent went up? News flash, Los Altos property values are rising, and BCS is getting more land. And maybe, just maybe, there were some errors in the calculations which have since been fixed. Whatever it is, there is no Diabolical Plan against the charter, as some would like you to believe, just people trying to educate kids. Oh, and some just trying to generate marketing hype...
Subscribe to:
Posts (Atom)